Topic A: Reducing the Economic Consequences of U.S.-China Trade Wars on Global Trade

The U.S.-China trade war, initiated in 2018, has significantly impacted global trade, leading to economic disruptions worldwide. Both nations imposed tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of goods, affecting key sectors such as technology, agriculture, and manufacturing. This conflict stems from disputes over trade imbalances, intellectual property rights (IPR), and geopolitical tensions, particularly concerning market access and state subsidies.

As a result, global supply chains have undergone restructuring, with companies aiming to reduce their dependence on Chinese manufacturing. Many Western businesses have embraced an "Anything But China" (ABC) strategy, relocating production to countries such as Vietnam, India, Malaysia, and Mexico. This shift seeks to mitigate risks associated with geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities. Between 2017 and 2023, the share of U.S. imports from the European Union rose by 2.4 percentage points, from Mexico by 2.1 points, and from Vietnam by 1.7 points, reflecting a diversification in sourcing strategies., respectively, highlighting a diversification in sourcing strategies.

Despite these shifts, China remains a dominant global exporter, making up approximately 14% of total global exports in 2023, an increase of 1.3 percentage points from 2017.. The trade war has also prompted China to strengthen economic ties with other nations, becoming the largest bilateral trading partner for 145 economies. This realignment has resulted in the emergence of distinct trade blocs: U.S.-aligned, China-aligned, and neutral countries.

The restructuring of global trade has had mixed economic effects. Emerging economies like Vietnam and Mexico have benefited from increased foreign investment, while others, such as smaller developing nations reliant on Chinese supply chains, have faced new challenges. To mitigate the negative impacts, policymakers, including delegates in the UN Economic and Financial Committee (ECOFIN), are encouraged to promote diplomatic negotiations, diversify trade partnerships, and invest in resilient supply chains. These measures align with ECOFIN’s goals of fostering economic stability and reducing the potential for future trade conflicts. The ongoing situation underscores the interconnected nature of global economies and the need for cooperative solutions among governments, businesses, and international organizations.

Topic B: The Impact of European Gas Price Caps on Energy Markets and Global Inflation

In response to soaring energy prices caused by geopolitical tensions, the European Union (EU) implemented a natural gas price cap in late 2022 to protect consumers and stabilize markets. The cap set a maximum price for natural gas transactions within the EU, aiming to prevent excessive price spikes. However, analyses suggest that this measure has not significantly reduced market volatility or effectively prevented price surges.

For example, in the second half of 2023, natural gas prices for household consumers slightly decreased to €0.1125 per kWh from €0.1137 per kWh the previous year, indicating a limited impact. Despite the price cap, energy costs remained substantially higher than pre-crisis levels, contributing to persistent inflationary pressures across the Eurozone. Studies have questioned the effectiveness of the cap, indicating that it neither lowers market volatility nor significantly curbs inflation.

Additionally, the cap has had unintended consequences, such as discouraging investment in energy infrastructure and supply diversification. Given the global nature of energy markets, European policy decisions have broader implications, influencing global natural gas flows and prices. For instance, Europe's increased demand for liquefied natural gas (LNG) has redirected supplies from other regions, affecting global energy dynamics.

To address these challenges, policymakers, particularly delegates in ECOFIN, must explore alternative strategies. These include enhancing energy efficiency, accelerating the transition to renewable energy sources, and strengthening international energy cooperation. These approaches align with the UN’s broader sustainability and economic resilience goals. A balanced strategy that includes market reforms and investment in sustainable energy solutions is essential for long-term stability. Ongoing assessments and adjustments to energy policies will be crucial as the EU navigates the evolving energy landscape.

By considering these factors, delegates can work towards solutions that protect consumers while ensuring a stable and sustainable global energy market.

Meet your Dias!